Johnson-Humrickhouse Museum


The Newark Holy Stones

The Newark Holy Stones is comprised of four objects: the Keystone, the Decalogue Stone, a two-piece box made to house the Decalogue Stone, and a bowl.  Both the Keystone and Decalogue Stone are inscribed in Hebrew.  The Decalogue Stone also bears an image of Moses.  Uncovered in the Newark earthworks in the 1860s, they were an immediate sensation.  The context suggested a link with the Hopewell Indian culture, which thrived between 100 BC and 500 AD.  Did the ancient Near East have the technology to sail to this continent 1000 years before Columbus?  Were the “Lost Tribes of Israel" the ancestors of the mound builders?  Or, were the stones fashioned in the mid 19th century and placed in the mounds to deceive the public for some personal gain?  The debate continues today as archaeologists (professional and amateur), anthropologists, linguists and religious groups jump into the fray armed with their field’s presuppositions and data. 

 

Historical Background

In 1860 David Wyrick, a Newark surveyor, discovered a carved and polished wedge-shaped stone in a shallow hole in a small, circular enclosure just east of Newark’s gigantic octagonal earthwork.  Inscribed on this stone were four inscriptions written in Hebrew:  “the Laws of Jehovah,” “the Word of the Lord,” “the Holy of Holies,” and “the King of the Earth.”  Some thought this find validated a popular belief that the builders of the Newark mounds were not Native Americans but the “Lost Tribes of Israel.”  Because of the stone’s shape, others identified it as a Masonic keystone.  Charles Whittlesey, one of Ohio’s noteworthy early archaeologists, thought it was neither Masonic nor Jewish but a relatively modern artifact.

 

Five months later the Decalogue Stone, encased in a custom-made stone box, was found in the Jacksontown Stone Mound, located a few miles southeast of Newark.  Most of the mound had already been torn down, the stones having been used to build Buckeye Lake.  The Decalogue Stone (7 x 3 x 1.75 inches) is shaped like a tombstone and is intricately carved all over with Hebraic letters that convey an abbreviated form of the Ten Commandments.  On the front side the inscription lines an arch that frames the image of a man identified as “Moses.” Unlike the Keystone, its alphabet was not identified as Modern Hebrew but some form of an archaic Hebrew.  The stones were sent to experts.  Most called the Decalogue Stone a fraud—too many scriptural mistakes and a lack of patina from being buried for so long.  A few found evidence of a patina and felt the glyphs could be an ancient yet strange form of Hebrew.  In short, the Holy Stones quickly rose to stardom, but soon afterwards were shouted down with accusations of fraud.  One problem remained—what would be the motive for creating such an elaborate, well-made hoax?

 

David Johnson, one of the Museum’s founders, was himself an amateur archaeologist and a member of the American Ethnological Society.  He excavated a number of mounds, even sending off human remains to be examined in New York.  In 1861 he purchased the Holy Stones but later considered them fraudulent and wished to sell them.  The Museum owns a letter from a Tiffany’s broker who suggested that since Johnson would not gain much by selling them, he may as well hold on to them, which, of course, he did.  They were part of the Johnson Brothers’ original collection was left to the city of Coshocton in the 1920s.  In 1980 the Holy Stones jumped back into the public eye and into the debate ring when Dr. Robert W. Alrutz of Denison University published a major paper on them.  He had been researching them since 1974.  The Newark Holy Stones: The History of an Archaeological Tragedy was the result—a comprehensive history based on original source material.

 

Theories on the Origin of the Newark Holy Stones

Brad Lepper, archaeologist with the Ohio Historical Society, believes the Holy Stones are a fraud.  Representing the standard archaeological position, Lepper states that beside Norse contact in eastern Canada, there is little or no authentic evidence of visits from Euro-Asia to the New World before Columbus.  The few examples have too many problems.  If there were significant contact, stuff (trash) would be left behind and professional archaeologists would find it.  Furthermore, he points to the questionable Hebrew script and the few missing words on the Decalogue Stone to disprove its authenticity. 

 

Varying groups believe that the Newark Stones, in particular, the Decalogue Stone, were made by Hebrews at the same time that the Hopewell Mounds were built (100 BC – AD 500).  One group who call themselves diffusionists believes there was fundamental cultural exchange between continents before the 15th century.  The Decalogue Stone is only one of several examples of Near Eastern writing that has been discovered in North America.  This school of thought is exemplified by J. Huston McCulloch (his article on the holy stones can be viewed here) and David Deal, publisher of The Ancient American magazine and the author of Discovery of Ancient AmericaSome members of the Latter Day Saints (Mormon) Church also claim that this early date of the Holy Stones supports their belief that the Lost Tribes of Israel populated North America in prehistoric times.

 

A new theory has recently been suggested by linguist Rochelle I. Altman in The Bible and Interpretation (January 2004).  Her theory is that the Newark Holy Stones—Keystone, Decalogue Stone and bowl, are Jewish ritual artifacts crafted during the late Medieval period (before the 15th c.) and probably made in France or Spain.  The text is written in a spiral or circling manner known as an Incantational Format.  She calls the Decalogue Stone a hand phylactery (a scripture reminder for the worshiper), the Keystone—a flow detector since flowing water was needed for cleansing, and the bowl a container for the water.  Altman does not create a neatly devised scheme for how the stones got buried in an Indian mound.  Her analysis, based primarily on writing style, presents yet another context for the use of the Newark Holy Stones.  (To read Altman’s article entitled “Newark Ritual Artifacts,” go here.  Click on Articles & Commentary, then on Archaeology.)

 

The Newark Holy Stones are on permanent display at the Museum.